Comments on: Mercurial http://efford.org/blog/archives/43 Random musings on Python, software engineering, the web & other stuff Thu, 21 Aug 2008 14:38:26 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.4 by: Gábor Farkas http://efford.org/blog/archives/43#comment-34927 Sun, 18 May 2008 14:05:30 +0000 http://efford.org/blog/archives/43#comment-34927 mercurial has a nice CGI-based web interface too (works fine with apache): http://hgbook.red-bean.com/hgbookch6.html#x10-1310006.6 mercurial has a nice CGI-based web interface too (works fine with apache): http://hgbook.red-bean.com/hgbookch6.html#x10-1310006.6

]]> by: Nick http://efford.org/blog/archives/43#comment-34808 Fri, 16 May 2008 22:37:18 +0000 http://efford.org/blog/archives/43#comment-34808 zerok: That's a cool idea! I guess it would work well for giving temporary access to small groups. What about a more permanent, scalable solution? Does Mercurial play nicely with Apache, for instance? zerok: That’s a cool idea! I guess it would work well for giving temporary access to small groups. What about a more permanent, scalable solution? Does Mercurial play nicely with Apache, for instance?

]]> by: zerok http://efford.org/blog/archives/43#comment-34779 Fri, 16 May 2008 14:53:45 +0000 http://efford.org/blog/archives/43#comment-34779 For sprints and such the whole `hg serve` command is also very useful for not only viewing the log in a webbrowser but also for giving other people access to your repository :-) For sprints and such the whole `hg serve` command is also very useful for not only viewing the log in a webbrowser but also for giving other people access to your repository :-)

]]> by: masklinn http://efford.org/blog/archives/43#comment-34774 Fri, 16 May 2008 13:04:28 +0000 http://efford.org/blog/archives/43#comment-34774 Wouldn't hurt if somebody tried to rewrite it using wx or qt, but it makes sense that gitk was originally written in tk and that hgk followed suite (tk being both simple and available pretty much everywhere) Wouldn’t hurt if somebody tried to rewrite it using wx or qt, but it makes sense that gitk was originally written in tk and that hgk followed suite (tk being both simple and available pretty much everywhere)

]]> by: Nick http://efford.org/blog/archives/43#comment-34767 Fri, 16 May 2008 11:16:14 +0000 http://efford.org/blog/archives/43#comment-34767 Yes, it is useful. Wish it was wxPython- or PyQt-based rather than Tk-based, but you can't have everything :) Yes, it is useful.

Wish it was wxPython- or PyQt-based rather than Tk-based, but you can’t have everything :)

]]> by: masklinn http://efford.org/blog/archives/43#comment-34754 Fri, 16 May 2008 08:44:34 +0000 http://efford.org/blog/archives/43#comment-34754 re view history, don't miss hgk (inspired by gitk), it's ugly as hell but it's a very nice way to view history, especially over multiple branches. re view history, don’t miss hgk (inspired by gitk), it’s ugly as hell but it’s a very nice way to view history, especially over multiple branches.

]]>